Home » Our Team » Jennifer Towle

Jennifer Towle

Ms. Towle has extensive experience practicing before various U.S. District Court and the U.S. International Trade Commission. Her practice focuses on patent litigation, counseling and licensing. She has litigated patent disputes involving a broad range of technologies, including telecommunications, semiconductor devices, software, and a variety of consumer electronics.

AREAS OF PRACTICE

Intellectual Property Litigation
Hatch-Waxman Act Litigation
Patent and Technology Licensing
Patent Valuations
Intellectual Property Due Diligence

REPRESENTATIVE CASES

Highlights of Ms. Towle’s work include:

Counsel for defendant in infringement action concerning a pull pin assembly. Caravan Canopy Int’l, Inc. v. Northern Tool & Equipment Co. (Eastern District of Texas)
Counsel for patent owner for infringement of patent related to coal-fired power plant emissions. Nalco Co. v. Wisconsin Power and Light et al. (Western District of Wisconsin); Nalco Co. v. Wisconsin Public Service (Western District of Wisconsin); Nalco Company v. Chem-Mod, LLC (Northern District of Illinois and U.S. Court of Federal Appeals)
Counsel for defendant in an ANDA action concerning the treatment and prevention of metabolic diseases. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH et al. v. HEC Pharm Co., Ltd. et al. (District of New Jersey)
Counsel for patent owner for infringement of a patent related to online and mobile commerce applications; Mobile Commerce Framework Inc. v. Yelp Inc. (Southern District of California); Mobile Commerce Framework Inc. v. Groupon Inc. (Southern District of California); Mobile Commerce Framework Inc. v. Foursquare Labs, Inc. (Southern District of California)
Counsel for patent owner for infringement of patents related to processor cache coherency; Memory Integrity, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc. (District of Delaware); Memory Integrity, LLC v. Apple, Inc. (District of Delaware); Memory Integrity, LLC v. Archos S.A., and Archos, Inc. (District of Delaware); Memory Integrity, LLC v. Asustek Computer, Inc. and Asus Computer International (District of Delaware); Memory Integrity, LLC v. Barnes & Noble, Inc., Nook Media, LLC and Nook Media, Inc. (District of Delaware); Memory Integrity, LLC v. Blackberry LTD and Blackberry Corporation (District of Delaware); Memory Integrity, LLC v. Fuhu, Inc. (District of Delaware); Memory Integrity, LLC v. Fujitsu Limited and Fujitsu America, Inc. (District of Delaware); Memory Integrity, LLC v. Google, Inc. and Motorola Mobility, LLC (District of Delaware); Memory Integrity, LLC v. Hisense International Co., Ltd. and Hisense USA Corporation (District of Delaware); Memory Integrity, LLC v. HTC Corporation and HTC America, Inc. (District of Delaware); Memory Integrity, LLC v. Huawei Devise USA, Inc. and Futurewei Technologies, Inc. (District of Delaware); Memory Integrity, LLC v. Intel Corporation (District of Delaware); Memory Integrity, LLC v. Lenovo Group Ltd., and Lenova (United States) Inc. (District of Delaware); Memory Integrity, LLC v. LG Electronics, Inc.; LG Electronics USA, Inc., and LG Electronics Mobilecomm USA, Inc. (District of Delaware); Memory Integrity, LLC v. Microsoft Corporation (District of Delaware); Memory Integrity, LLC v. Motorola Solutions, Inc., (District of Delaware); Memory Integrity, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, LLC, and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (District of Delaware); Memory Integrity, LLC v. Sony Corporation, Sony Electronics, Inc., Sony Mobile Communications (USA) Inc., and Sony Mobile Communications AB (District of Delaware); Memory Integrity, LLC v. Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba America, Inc. and Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc. (District of Delaware); and Memory Integrity, LLC v. ZTE Corporation and ZTE (USA) Inc. (District of Delaware)
Counsel for patent owner for infringement of patents related to networking transmissions; Net Navigation Systems, LLC v. Arista Networks, Inc. (Eastern District of Texas); Net Navigation Systems, LLC v. Avaya, Inc. (Eastern District of Texas); Net Navigation Systems, LLC v. Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. (Eastern District of Texas); Net Navigation Systems, LLC v. Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson and Ericsson, Inc. (Eastern District of Texas); Net Navigation Systems, LLC v. Extreme Networks, Inc. (Eastern District of Texas)
Counsel for patent owner for infringement of patent related to user interface technology; I2Z Technology, LLC Citygrid Media LLC et al. (District of Delaware); I2Z Technology, LLC v. Hotels.com, LP (Northern District of Texas); I2Z Technology, LLC v. Microsoft Corporation et al. (District of Oregon); I2Z Technology, LLC v. Orbitz Worldwide, Inc. (Northern District of Illinois)

EDUCATION

Roger Williams University School of Law, J.D., 2001
The University of California, Irvine, M.S., Chemistry, 1998
Brandeis University, B.A., Chemistry, 1995

PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS

State Bar of Texas
State Bar of California
U.S. District Court, Northern District of California
U.S. District Court, Southern District of California
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas
U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas
U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas
U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Honors and Distinctions

Texas Super Lawyers, Thomas Reuters, 2020